This page has been permanently moved. Please
CLICK HERE to be redirected.
What Is Oracle DB Time, DB CPU, Wall Time and Non-Idle Wait Time
If you are into tuning Oracle Database systems, you care about time. And if you care about time, then you need to understand the most important time parameters: what they are, their differences, how they relate to each other and how to use them in your performance tuning work.
The key Oracle Database time parameters are elapsed time, database time (DB Time), non-idle wait time and server process CPU consumption (DB CPU) time.
This first post is pretty basic, yet core fundamental stuff. So in the following two posts I'll introduce elapsed time, add parallelism into the mix and revisit wall time. What initially seems simple can some take very interesting twists!
You probably know that I am all about quantitative Oracle performance analysis. I research, write, teach, and speak about it. I even have an OraPub Online Institute seminar about how to tune your Oracle Database systems from a standard AWR or Statspack report using an Oracle Time Based Analysis (OTBA) framework.
So let's get started!
Wall Time & Run Time
I'll start with Wall Time because that is close (hopefully) to what a user experiences. In fact, if there is no time gap between the Oracle Database and the user, then we can do a little math and figure out what the users are, on average, experiencing. I'll get back to wall time in the next post, where I include elapsed time and parallelism into the equation.
DB CPU is Oracle server/foreground/shadow process CPU consumption. Each Oracle server process gathers its own CPU consumption using the time and/or getrusage C function system call. So unless there is a major screw-up by either the operating system or the Oracle kernel developers, the time will be good... very good. The name DB CPU is taken from the actual statistic name, which is found in both v$sess_time_model and v$sys_time_model.
If you look at any AWR or Statspack report in the "Time Model" section, you will see DB CPU. The value shown will be all server process CPU consumption within the reporting snapshot interval, converted to seconds. (The raw statistic is stored in microseconds.)
Below is an example Time Model Statistics screen shot from a standard AWR report. I've highlighted DB CPU.
If you run one of my OraPub System Monitor (OSM) time related tools like ttpctx.sql or rtpctx.sql you see a CPU time statistic. That contains both the DB CPU (i.e., server process) and "background process cpu" statistics. Here's an example.
SQL> @ttpctx.sql Remember: This report must be run twice so both the initial and final values are available. If no output, press ENTER about 11 times. Database: prod35 31-JUL-14 12:09pm Report: ttpctx.sql OSM by OraPub, Inc. Page 1 Total Time Activity (142 sec interval) Avg Time Time Wait Time Component % TT % WT Waited (ms) (sec) Count(k) ------------------------------------- ------- ------- ----------- ----------- -------- CPU consumption: Oracle SP + BG procs 95.95 0.00 0.000 347.212 0 PX Deq: Slave Session Stats 1.45 35.74 0.113 5.240 47 library cache: mutex X 0.58 14.26 0.136 2.090 15 PX Deq: Slave Join Frag 0.43 10.57 0.067 1.550 23 PX Deq: Signal ACK EXT 0.29 7.16 0.045 1.050 23 control file parallel write 0.28 7.03 20.600 1.030 0 PX qref latch 0.27 6.75 0.012 0.990 85 latch free 0.20 4.91 0.090 0.720 8 log file parallel write 0.16 4.02 12.826 0.590 0
Non-Idle Wait Time
When an Oracle process can not consume CPU, it will pause. As an Oracle DBA, we know this as wait time. Sometimes a process waits and it's not a performance problem, so we call this Idle Wait Time. Oracle background processes typically have lots of idle wait time. However, when a user is waiting for sometime to complete and way down deep their Oracle server process is waiting to get perhaps a lock or latch, this is Non-Idle Wait Time. Obviously, when tuning Oracle we care a lot about non-idle wait time.
Below is a simple query showing wait event classifications. In this system there are 119 Idle wait events, so all the rest would be classified as non-idle wait events.
Oracle uses a variety of methods to determine wait time. I have a number of postings and educational content available about this. You'll see them if you do an OraPub or blog search for "time".
When working with non-idle wait time, remember the 80/20 rule. Most of the wait time we care about will be contained with in the largest ("top") two to four wait events. Don't waste YOUR time focusing on the 20%.
Here's an example. In the screen shot below, while not shown the total wait time is 1966 seconds.
My OSM toolkit has many wait time related tools. Most start with "sw" for "session wait" but the both ttpctx.sql or rtpctx.sql will contain the non-idle wait time and also CPU consumption. This is a good time to transition into DB Time.
DB Time is a time model statistic that is the sum of Oracle process CPU consumption and non-idle wait time. When optimizing Oracle systems we typically focus on reducing "time", though many times database work is also part of the equation. This "time" is essentially DB Time, though sometimes I take control over what I consider idle wait time.
The name DB Time comes from the actual statistic name in both v$sess_time_model and v$sys_time_model.
If you look at any AWR or Statspack report in the "Time Model" section, you will see DB Time.
A Little Math
We have enough detail to relate DB Time, DB CPU and non-idle wait time together... using a little math.
DB Time = DB CPU + non_idle_wait_time
And of course,
non_idle_wait_time = DB Time - DB CPU
This is important, because there is no single statistic that shows all the non-idle wait time. This must be derived. Shown above is one way to derive the non-idle wait time. Take a look at the AWR report snippet below.
In the Non-Idle Wait Time section above, I stated that the total non-idle wait time was 1966 seconds. I derived this from the Time Model screen shown above. I simply did:
non_idle_wait_time = DB Time - DB CPU 1966.16 = 4032.03 - 2065.87
Coming Up Next
I wanted to keep this post short, which means I left out the more interesting topics. So in the next post I'll merge into the picture elapsed time along with parallelism and revisit wall time. Then in the third post (that's my guess at this point), I'll actually demonstrate this in two different systems.
Thanks for reading,